Counterbalancing the disadvantages of the 'Have Nots': an examination of the impact of amicus participation in state supreme court cases
| Autor: | Bianca Easterly |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Government
Sociology and Political Science 05 social sciences Public policy Political communication Discount points 0506 political science Disadvantaged Power (social and political) State supreme court Political science Law 0502 economics and business Interest group 050602 political science & public administration 050207 economics |
| Zdroj: | Interest Groups & Advocacy. 8:579-599 |
| ISSN: | 2047-7422 2047-7414 |
| DOI: | 10.1057/s41309-019-00057-w |
| Popis: | Party capability theory posits that litigation success is predicated on litigants’ experience as parties to lawsuits as well as their access to resources. The stakes are particularly high for disadvantaged litigants in asymmetric power relationships, such as those between government (“The Haves”) and criminal defendants (“The Have Nots”). Scholars have found that interest group participation via amicus curiae—or “friend of the court”—briefs can reduce litigant power disparities in federal appellate cases, but it remains unclear whether the same holds in criminal matters before courts of last resort. As a starting point to understanding interest group behavior in state supreme court criminal cases, this study examines party capability theory and the extent to which, if any, amicus participation affects decision making that favors the government. Findings underscore the importance of interest group participation that supports disadvantaged litigants and the impact crime severity has on outcomes in criminal state supreme court cases. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink