Autor: |
Mary E. Maniscalco-Theberge, Gary D. Fleischer, David P. Jaques, Douglas A. Hale, Matthew L. Brengman |
Rok vydání: |
1999 |
Předmět: |
|
Zdroj: |
Current Surgery. 56:441-444 |
ISSN: |
0149-7944 |
DOI: |
10.1016/s0149-7944(99)00159-2 |
Popis: |
Purpose T his study was designed to determine whether a directed clinical evaluation could eliminate the need for routine daily chest X-rays (CXRs) in surgical intensive care unit patients. Methods All patients admitted to a 10-bed surgical intensive care unit in a university-affiliated medical center were eligible for evaluation. Patients were evaluated using a 20-point Clinical Evaluation Score (CES) prior to their routine daily CXRs. An evaluation was deemed positive if any parameter was scored as positive. Major CXR findings requiring intervention and minor CXR findings representing changes but not mandating intervention were recorded. Descriptive statistics were used to relate the CES to the CXR findings. Results Fifty-one patients had 216 CESs and CXRs compared. There were 77 positive CESs (36%) and 139 negative CESs (64%). A positive CES predicted 31 of 33 major CXR findings. For major CXR findings requiring intervention, CES had a sensitivity of 94% and a negative predictive value of 98%. Conclusions By utilizing a structured clinical evaluation to determine the need for a morning CXR in this study, we could have eliminated 64% of routine morning CXRs. |
Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |
|