EP.TH.855Hartmanns reversal - Laparoscopic Vs Open, UHNM experience over the last 3 years

Autor: Nandu Nair, Sudipta Roy, Umar Haneef, Zehong Chen
Rok vydání: 2021
Předmět:
Zdroj: British Journal of Surgery. 108
ISSN: 1365-2168
0007-1323
DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znab309.086
Popis: Aim Reversal of hartmanns is still an operation associated with significant morbidity. Although various studies have tried to assess the best time for attempting reversal after the primary operation, there is still no consensus. The aim of our study was to look at our experience over the last three years to find any possible factors which determine the duration between primary operation and reversal and compare laparoscopic vs open approach. Methods Prospective cohort including consisting of patients who underwent hartmanns reversal in 3 years was analysed (January-2017 to December-2019). Data was collected retrospectively from clinical notes. Results Among the patients (n = 50) there was equal distribution of males (52%) and females (48%). Although the initial operation was open in 74% patients, reversal was attempted laparoscopically in 46% with a conversion rate of 43.4%. Median duration between initial operation and reversal was 433 days. There was no significant association between duration before reversal and patient comorbidities or the indication for the index procedure. Also there was no statistical difference in postoperative hospital stay or immediate postoperative morbidity between laparoscopic and open hartmanns reversal. Conclusion There was no difference in immediate postoperative outcomes between patients who had laparoscopic or open hartmanns reversal. There was no determining factor which made the surgeon prefer laparoscopic over open approach nor was there a difference in duration between primary operation and reversal based of patient factors or method of approach. Hence timing of hartmanns reversal and the method of approach still depends on surgeon preference and experience.
Databáze: OpenAIRE