The History Is Important in Patients with Suspected Acute Appendicitis / with Invited Commentary
Autor: | Hartwig Kørner, Arne Nysted, Lars J. Vatten, Jon Arne Søreide, Karl Søndenaa |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2000 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Digestive Surgery. 17:364-369 |
ISSN: | 1421-9883 0253-4886 |
DOI: | 10.1159/000018880 |
Popis: | Background/Aims: The clinical diagnosis of acute appendicitis is incorrect in 20–30% of patients undergoing surgery. We analysed the clinical importance of nine commonly used symptoms and signs in 544 consecutive patients with regard to the correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Methods: Open population-based prospective study. The degree of the surgeon’s certainty of the preoperative diagnosis was assessed. The final diagnosis was based on histology. Logistic regression was used to analyze the independent value of nine symptoms and signs to predict acute appendicitis by calculating odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: In 434 of 544 patients (80%) acute appendicitis was confirmed. A history of nausea or vomiting (OR = 2.3; CI = 1.11 to 4.76) and pain migration to right iliac fossa (OR = 1.9; CI = 1.12 to 3.22) were significant predictors of acute appendicitis. Pain migration was found to be an independent predictor in females and nausea or vomiting in males. In the group of patients (29%) with an uncertain preoperative diagnosis, pain migration predicted a correct diagnosis in females (OR = 4.7; CI = 1.2 to 18), while tenderness over McBurney’s point was a significant predictor in males (OR = 8.3; CI = 1.1 to 63). Conclusions: A history of pain migration and nausea or vomiting were independent predictors for the correct diagnosis of acute appendicitis in patients undergoing surgery. Thus, patient history is important in this patient group. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |