The PRoBe-SH: A Close-Coded Patient-Reported Survey Tool to Assess Breast Surgery History
| Autor: | Janelle Sobecki, Emily Abramsohn, Alexes Hazen, Jennifer Makelarski, Chenab Navalkha, Kristen Wroblewski, Stacy Lindau |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Archives of Breast Cancer. :505-511 |
| ISSN: | 2383-0433 2383-0425 |
| DOI: | 10.32768/abc.202294505-511 |
| Popis: | Background: Diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer often involves several surgical procedures. Women with breast cancer are asked repeatedly to report their breast surgery history, often elicited in an open-ended format and relying on patient recall. Electronic medical records (EMR) and other medical documentation are not always readily available. No comprehensive, validated patient-reported measure of breast surgery history exists. We developed a close-coded, digital survey tool to elicit patient-reported breast surgery history (PRoBe-SH). Methods: We administered the PRoBe-SH survey tool to a convenience sample of patients with a history of breast cancer. We compared PRoBe-SH data to both surgical history documented in patients’ EMR and open-ended surgical history ascertained from patient-completed clinic intake forms. Sensitivity/specificity analyses and McNemar’s tests were performed. Results: Data from fifty patients (median age 53.5 years, range 31-71, 70% non-Hispanic white) were analyzed. The sensitivity of the PRoBe-SH for accurately identifying surgical history was 100% for mastectomy, lumpectomy 96%, mastectomy sidedness 100% (right) and 100% (left), lumpectomy sidedness 36% (right) 55% (left), lymphadenectomy 64%, breast reconstruction 89%, and presence of a native nipple 100% (right) and 100% (left). Open-ended surgical history was more than 90% sensitive for identifying mastectomy and lumpectomy only. The PRoBe-SH was significantly more sensitive than open-ended surgical history for identifying mastectomy sidedness (P |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|