1201 Performance Evaluation Of A Novel Contactless Breathing Monitor And Machine Learning Algorithm For Sleep Stage Classification In A Healthy Population
| Autor: | Michal Maslik, Timo Lauteslager, S Kampakis, Adrian J. Williams, Fares Siddiqui |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Stage classification
Sleep Stages medicine.diagnostic_test Computer science business.industry Healthy population Actigraphy Polysomnography medicine.disease Machine learning computer.software_genre Obstructive sleep apnea Physiology (medical) medicine Breathing Neurology (clinical) Sleep (system call) Artificial intelligence business computer |
| Zdroj: | Sleep. 43:A459-A459 |
| ISSN: | 1550-9109 0161-8105 |
| DOI: | 10.1093/sleep/zsaa056.1195 |
| Popis: | Introduction Although polysomnography (PSG) remains the gold standard for sleep assessment in a lab setting, non-EEG signals such as respiration and motion are directly affected by sleep stages and can be used for sleep stage prediction. Importantly, these signals can be obtained in a low-cost and unobtrusive manner, allowing for large scale and longitudinal data collection in a home environment. The Circadia C100 System (FDA 510(k) clearance expected Q1 2020) is a novel ‘nearable’ device that uses radar for contactless monitoring of respiration and motion. The current study aims to validate the performance of the associated sleep analysis algorithm. Methods A total of 41 nights of sleep data were recorded from 33 healthy participants using the device, alongside PSG. Data were recorded both in a sleep lab and home environment. PSG data were scored by RPSGT-certified technicians. Respiration and movement features were extracted, and machine learning algorithms were developed to perform sleep stage classification and predict sleep metrics. Algorithms were trained and validated on PSG data using cross-validation. Results An epoch-by-epoch true positive rate of 56.2%, 79.4%, 55.5% and 72.6% was found for ‘Wake’, ‘REM’, ‘Light’ and ‘Deep’ respectively. No statistical differences in performance were found between home-recorded and lab-recorded contactless data. Mean absolute error of total sleep time (TST), wake after sleep onset (WASO), and sleep efficiency (SE) was 13.2 minutes, 11.3 minutes and 3%, respectively. The contactless monitor was found to outperform both medical grade and clinical grade actigraphy based devices: The Philips Actiwatch Spectrum Plus and the Fitbit Alta HR. Conclusion Current results are encouraging and suggest that the contactless monitor could be used for long-term sleep assessment and continuous evaluation of sleep therapy outcomes. Further clinical validation work is ongoing in subjects diagnosed with sleep disorders such as obstructive sleep apnea. Support |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|