Stakeholder status in the identification, prioritization and management of college athletic donors
| Autor: | Alicia M. Cintron, Matt R. Huml |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: |
Marketing
Hierarchy business.industry Strategy and Management 05 social sciences Stakeholder College athletics Context (language use) Public relations Stakeholder management Test (assessment) Tourism Leisure and Hospitality Management 0502 economics and business Business and International Management Psychology business Social identity theory Stakeholder theory 050203 business & management 050212 sport leisure & tourism |
| Zdroj: | Sport, Business and Management: An International Journal. 11:451-471 |
| ISSN: | 2042-678X |
| DOI: | 10.1108/sbm-09-2020-0085 |
| Popis: | PurposeThe purpose of this study is to examine how athletic fundraising managers perceive status and seek to use status to identify, prioritize and manage stakeholders within college athletics.Design/methodology/approachTo test this purpose, the researchers use the Gioia methodology to interview 19 college athletic department fundraising officers within National Collegiate Athletics Association (NCAA) institutions. Following interviews, the data were analyzed by the researchers and structured within a first-order and second-order concept designation.FindingsInterviews show that status is an effective concept for explaining how athletic fundraisers identify and prioritize donors. Officers relied on economic (capacity) and social (passion and interest) factors to rank order donors. The results also show that athletic departments use status to manage stakeholders by rewarding their giving and escalating their commitment. Status is used in four strategies to manage the donor hierarchy: benefits, recognition, membership and access. Each strategy highlighted exclusivity and rank order.Originality/valueThere is a need to empirically test the application of status within the stakeholder theory context. These findings also contribute to the evolution of stakeholder management beyond the use of social identity theory or stakeholder salience. It helps our understanding of the evolving relationship between fundraiser and donor by recognizing the importance of capacity, passion and interests when identifying and prioritizing donors. Further, status-markers such as exclusive benefits, recognition, membership and access can be used to manage donors toward the organization's goals. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|