| Autor: |
Alejandro Lazo-Langner, Ian Chin-Yee, Yahui T. Lin, Cindy Tze-Yung Lam, Deborah J. Wong, Stephanie Lynn Go |
| Rok vydání: |
2010 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
Transfusion. 51:742-752 |
| ISSN: |
0041-1132 |
| DOI: |
10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.02951.x |
| Popis: |
BACKGROUND: In Canada, all men who have sex with men (MSM) are indefinitely deferred from donating blood. The purpose of this study was to determine the acceptability of an alternative behavior-based donor health questionnaire among Canadian university students. Further we sought to determine the perception of blood safety associated with specific risk behaviors. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Questions found on the Canadian Blood Services' donor health assessment questionnaire as well as from studies assessing high-risk behavior for human immunodeficiency virus infection were included. For each question participants were asked to rate the acceptability, comfort in answering, perceived effect on blood safety, and whether the question would deter them from donating blood. Data were analyzed using nonparametric tests. RESULTS: A total of 741 students participated in the study. Questions regarding sexual practices of the donor were rated less important for blood safety compared to those assessing for sexually transmitted infections, sex for money, and injection drug use (30%-62% vs. 69%-95% unsafe). A total of 24.4% of students rated both questions on MSM status and a behavior-based alternative as equally unacceptable. We found an inverse correlation between perception of safety and acceptability of questions. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that a behavior-based screening modification is unlikely to change opinions or satisfy those who object to the MSM current policy in place. Acceptability of these questions might be related to a poor understanding of the effect of sexual practices on blood supply safety. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text