Co-designing tools for workplace learning
| Autor: | Dieter Theiler, Stefanie Lindstaedt, Tobias Ley, Vladimir Tomberg, Tamsin Treasure-Jones, Sebastian Maximilian Dennerlein |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
Computer science
Design-based research 05 social sciences Stakeholder 050301 education Context (language use) 02 engineering and technology Sensemaking Library and Information Sciences Informal learning Data science Computer Science Applications Education Appropriation 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering 020201 artificial intelligence & image processing Affordance 0503 education Formal learning |
| Zdroj: | Information and Learning Sciences. 121:175-205 |
| ISSN: | 2398-5348 |
| DOI: | 10.1108/ils-09-2019-0093 |
| Popis: | Purpose Introducing technology at work presents a special challenge as learning is tightly integrated with workplace practices. Current design-based research (DBR) methods are focused on formal learning context and often questioned for a lack of yielding traceable research insights. This paper aims to propose a method that extends DBR by understanding tools as sociocultural artefacts, co-designing affordances and systematically studying their adoption in practice. Design/methodology/approach The iterative practice-centred method allows the co-design of cognitive tools in DBR, makes assumptions and design decisions traceable and builds convergent evidence by consistently analysing how affordances are appropriated. This is demonstrated in the context of health-care professionals’ informal learning, and how they make sense of their experiences. The authors report an 18-month DBR case study of using various prototypes and testing the designs with practitioners through various data collection means. Findings By considering the cognitive level in the analysis of appropriation, the authors came to an understanding of how professionals cope with pressure in the health-care domain (domain insight); a prototype with concrete design decisions (design insight); and an understanding of how memory and sensemaking processes interact when cognitive tools are used to elaborate representations of informal learning needs (theory insight). Research limitations/implications The method is validated in one long-term and in-depth case study. While this was necessary to gain an understanding of stakeholder concerns, build trust and apply methods over several iterations, it also potentially limits this. Originality/value Besides generating traceable research insights, the proposed DBR method allows to design technology-enhanced learning support for working domains and practices. The method is applicable in other domains and in formal learning. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|