The Analysis of Scientific Guidance Academic Procrastination

Autor: Muljono Damopolii, M. Yusuf T., Muhammad Shabir U., Kamsinah Kamsinah
Rok vydání: 2020
Předmět:
Zdroj: Universal Journal of Educational Research. 8:7078-7084
ISSN: 2332-3213
2332-3205
Popis: Guiding involves verbal communication interactions and engages in complex cognitive aspects. The cognitive deviation between individuals during the guidance process of writing academic papers is a determining factor as well as differentiates the results of guiding. This study aimed to study the effects of academic procrastination on the scientific guidance process at the Postgraduate Program of UIN Alauddin Makassar. This study used quantitative and qualitative methods. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze the quantitative data, and the descriptive qualitative data were analyzed using a responsive evaluation model developed by Robert Stake, which covered three main phases; antecedents, transactions, and outcomes. The research instruments were questionnaire and interview. The questionnaire used three aspects of procrastination standardized by Tuckman. Those three aspects were developed into 35 items of procrastination statements with answer choices using the Five-Point of Likert Scale; always, often, sometimes, rarely, and never. While semi structured-interview was used to gain additional data related to the students' writing academic guidance process. The research finding indicated that the academic procrastination on academic guidance was moderate so that the quality of students' academic works was relatively low. Therefore, The students' academic procrastination and the imperfect formal flow of guidance affect academic guidance process not run optimally. This study recommends that Postgraduate UIN Alauddin Makassar should compile guidelines for the writing of scientific papers that are applied exclusively to the needs of the guidance and reporting of scientific papers.
Databáze: OpenAIRE