| Popis: |
Depleted hydrocarbon reservoirs are considered inherently safe for carbon sequestration, but high well density penetrating the CO2 storage reservoir could compromise the containment performance in a carbon, capture & sequestration (CCS) project. Based on the available well data, it is crucial to understand the age of the well, materials used for wellbore construction, cement quality, barriers performance, and well integrity. A risk management methodology can be incorporated to evaluate primary and secondary barriers in existing plugged and abandoned (P&A) and development wells to ensure long-term fate of CO2 sequestration project. Existing P&A wells and development wells in a depleted field were drilled 3–5 decades ago. The wellbore construction utilized non-corrosive resistant materials. Health of all wells that ever penetrated the CO2 storage reservoir need to be analyzed from long term perspective of storing CO2. Throughout the lifespan of wells, subsurface barriers should maintain hydraulic isolation to prevent leakage happening from subsurface to environment of reservoir fluids and injected CO2. Deterioration of strength of wellbore construction material due to corrosion, induced by downhole pressure and temperature conditions, should be considered. This study investigated 3 exploration and 21 development wells. Risk register was developed for each well describing causes and CO2 leakage risks, impacts and consequences. Metrics were defined for parameters such as well age, well head materials, wellhead functional test and leak test, sustained casing pressures for risk determination. Wells were risk rated individually based on the assessment. Wells with low risk can be utilized for well conversion. While for high-risk wells, an opportunity risk matrix was developed to mitigate risks in all the wells. This study evaluates the well integrity and CO2 leakage risk along the wells that penetrated the CO2 storage reservoir. The improved rigorous risk assessment exercise evaluates well barrier failure causes and impacts along with estimating the risk number per well. The well risk assessment score calculated was between 9.24 and 13.35 for 21 development wells. Out of these 21 wells, 4 wells with risk score |
