Effect of different types of drain to postoperative effusion and pain on patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting

Autor:	Pınar Orhan, Zehra Belhan, Eyüp Murat Ökten, Selçuk Görmez, Eşref Hasan Karabulut, Fevzi Toraman, Cem Aritürk
Rok vydání:	2015
Předmět:	medicine.medical_specialty Pain score Bypass grafting business.industry Pleural effusion FIFTEEN-DAY General Medicine medicine.disease Demographic data Surgery medicine.anatomical_structure Effusion Anesthesia medicine business Artery
Zdroj:	Bakirkoy Tip Dergisi / Medical Journal of Bakirkoy. :154-158
ISSN:	1305-9327 1305-9319
DOI:	10.5350/btdmjb201511404
Popis:	Objective: The study was done to determine the effect of different types of drain to postoperative effusion and pain on patients who enderwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Material and Methods: 50 patients data were evaluated prospectively. Standart drain was placed into 7-8th intercostal area (Group 1). L drain was placed into pleural area (Group 2). Demographic data, drainage amounts were written from hospital documents. Postoperative phericardial and pleural effusion was determined by echocardiography and chest x-ray. Verbal Rating Scale was used to dedicate pain score. Data were analyzed by T test. Results: Groups demographic data were similar. Drainage was 652.0±328.3 ml (Group 1), 620.0 ± 169.5 ml (p=0.04) in Group 2. Pain score before taking of drain was 2.0±2.6 (Group 1), 1.0±1.6 (p=0.01) in Group 2, after taking of drain was 4.7±3.0 (Group 1), 2.1±2.0 (p=0.05) in Group 2. Fifteen day mean phericardial effusion was 0.2±0.4 cm (Group 1), 0.1±0.3 (p=0.05) in Group 2. There was no difference between other parameters. Conclusion: Using both types of drain seems to be safe but L drain is more comfortable because of less pain.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::d3f50ed1285a2f931637323d544f0c1b https://doi.org/10.5350/btdmjb201511404 Zobrazit plný text záznamu