| Autor: |
Bethany Gettings, Jason P. Londo, Scott J. Teresi, Nolan Bornowski, Jyothi Kumar, Julian Venegas, Robert VanBuren, Anna C. Haber, Margaret H. Frank, Robert Z. Shrote, Hao Wang, Eleanore J. Ritter, Emily E. Jennings, Yunfei Long, Keivan Bahmani, Rie Sadohara, Wei Dong, Zoë Migicovsky, Philip Engelgau, Luke M. Gregory, Serena G. Lotreck, Fabio Gomez-Cano, Sunil Kumar Kenchanmane Raju, Christina Chiu, Davis T. Mathieu, Abigail E. Bryson, Zhongjie Ji, Joey Mullins, McKena L. Wilson, Maya Wilson Brown, Thilanka Ranaweera, Prabhjot Kaur, Kaila E. Smith, Alyssa R. Tarrant, Daniel H. Chitwood, Donghee Hoh |
| Rok vydání: |
2020 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Popis: |
Premise of studyLeaf morphology is dynamic, continuously deforming during leaf expansion and among leaves within a shoot. We measured leaf morphology from over 200 vines over four years, and modeled changes in leaf shape along the shoot to determine if a composite “shape of shapes” can better capture variation and predict species identity compared to individual leaves.MethodsUsing homologous universal landmarks found in grapevine leaves, we modeled various morphological features as a polynomial function of leaf node. The resulting functions are used to reconstruct modeled leaf shapes across shoots, generating composite leaves that comprehensively capture the spectrum of possible leaf morphologies.ResultsWe found that composite leaves are better predictors of species identity than individual leaves from the same plant. We were able to use composite leaves to predict species identity of previously unassigned vines, which were verified with genotyping.DiscussionObservations of individual leaf shape fail to capture the true diversity between species. Composite leaf shape—an assemblage of modeled leaf snapshots across the shoot—is a better representation of the dynamic and essential shapes of leaves, as well as serving as a better predictor of species identity than individual leaves. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
