Economic and environmental evaluation of coal-and-biomass-to-liquids-and-electricity plants equipped with carbon capture and storage
| Autor: | Matthew L. Aitken, Daniel H. Loughlin, William H. Yelverton, Rebecca Dodder |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
Economics and Econometrics
Engineering Environmental Engineering Waste management Clean coal business.industry 020209 energy Environmental engineering Bio-energy with carbon capture and storage 02 engineering and technology Management Monitoring Policy and Law Clean coal technology General Business Management and Accounting Electricity generation Synthetic fuel Greenhouse gas 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Carbon capture and storage Environmental Chemistry Coal business |
| Zdroj: | Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy. 18:573-581 |
| ISSN: | 1618-9558 1618-954X |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s10098-015-1020-z |
| Popis: | Among various clean energy technologies, one innovative option for reducing the emission of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and criteria pollutants involves pairing carbon capture and storage (CCS) with the production of synthetic fuels and electricity from a combination of coal and sustainably sourced biomass. With a relatively pure CO2 stream as an inherent byproduct of the process, most of the resulting GHG emissions can be eliminated by simply compressing the CO2 for pipeline transport. Subsequent storage of the CO2 output in underground reservoirs can result in very low—perhaps even near-zero—net GHG emissions, depending on the fraction of biomass as input and its CO2 signature. To examine the potential market penetration and environmental impact of coal-and-biomass-to-liquids-and-electricity (CBtLE), a system-wide sensitivity analysis was performed using the MARKet ALlocation energy model. CBtLE was found to be most competitive in scenarios with a combination of high oil prices, low CCS costs, and, unexpectedly, non-stringent carbon policies. In the scheme considered here (30 % biomass input on an energy basis and 85 % carbon capture), CBtLE fails to achieve significant market share in deep decarbonization scenarios, regardless of oil prices and CCS costs. Such facilities would likely require higher fractions of biomass feedstock and captured CO2 to successfully compete in a carbon-constrained energy system. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink