Integrity tests predict counterproductive work behaviors and job performance well: Comment on Van Iddekinge, Roth, Raymark, and Odle-Dusseau (2012)

Autor:	Deniz S. Ones, Frank L. Schmidt, Chockalingam Viswesvaran
Rok vydání:	2012
Předmět:	Identification (information) Job performance Honesty media_common.quotation_subject Work (physics) Personnel selection Test validity Moderation Psychology Social psychology Applied Psychology Test (assessment) media_common
Zdroj:	Journal of Applied Psychology. 97:537-542
ISSN:	1939-1854 0021-9010
DOI:	10.1037/a0024825
Popis:	Examination of the Van Iddekinge, Roth, Raymark, and Odle-Dusseau (2012) meta-analysis reveals a number of problems. They meta-analyzed a partial database of integrity test validities. An examination of their coded database revealed that measures coded as integrity tests and meta-analyzed as such often included scales that are not in fact integrity tests. In addition, there were important deficiencies in their analytic approach relating to application of range restriction corrections and identification of moderators. We found the absence of fully hierarchical moderator analyses to be a serious weakness. We also explain why empirical comparisons between test publishers versus non-publishers cannot unambiguously lead to inferences of bias, as alternate explanations are possible, even likely. In light of the problems identified, it appears that the conclusions about integrity test validity drawn by Van Iddekinge et al. cannot be considered accurate or reliable.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::d1b07518fca953598ba5767869ff51bd https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024825 Zobrazit plný text záznamu