Kant and Strasbourg on Mandatory Vaccinations
| Autor: | Paul Gragl |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Zdroj: | European Convention on Human Rights Law Review. 3:220-262 |
| ISSN: | 2666-3236 2666-3228 |
| DOI: | 10.1163/26663236-bja10037 |
| Popis: | Mandatory vaccination raises important questions of human rights, especially if moral norms are given effect in legal provisions. I argue – assuming the safety and efficacy of vaccines – that we are under a moral obligation to vaccinate. Although Kant himself was hostile towards vaccinations, his Categorical Imperative exhorts us to respect the autonomy and dignity of others, and if these ‘others’ are the most vulnerable members of society who cannot be vaccinated for medical reasons, we can only protect them by vaccinating ourselves. The ECtHR (implicitly) follows this reasoning in its case law, particularly in its most recent relevant decision, in Vavřička, in which it maintained that even though mandatory vaccination interferes with certain Convention rights, this can be justified in terms of social solidarity and the weighing of interests. We consequently see that in this context, the echr system is very much in line with Kant’s notion of morality. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|