Patient experiences: a systematic review of quality improvement interventions in a hospital setting
| Autor: | Lisanne M. Verweij, Hileen Boosman, Jan A. Hazelzet, Hans van Ewijk, Lennard Voogt, Carla M Bastemeijer |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2019 |
| Předmět: |
Quality management
business.industry 030503 health policy & services Psychological intervention MEDLINE PsycINFO 03 medical and health sciences Critical appraisal 0302 clinical medicine Nursing 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Patient experience Health care Medicine 0305 other medical science business Patient education |
| Zdroj: | Patient Related Outcome Measures. 10:157-169 |
| ISSN: | 1179-271X |
| DOI: | 10.2147/prom.s201737 |
| Popis: | Purpose: In the era of value-based healthcare, one strives for the most optimal outcomes and experiences from the perspective of the patient. So, patient experiences have become a key quality indicator for healthcare. While these are supposed to drive quality improvement (QI), their use and effectiveness for this purpose has been questioned. The aim of this systematic review was to provide insight into QI interventions used in a hospital setting and their effects on improving patient experiences, and possible barriers and promoters for QI work. Methods: Prisma guidelines were used to design this review. International academic literature was searched in Embase, Medline OvidSP, Web of Science, Cochrane Central, PubMed Publisher, Scopus, PsycInfo, and Google Scholar. In total, 3,289 studies were retrieved and independently screened by the first two authors for eligibility and methodological quality. Data was extracted on the study purpose, setting, design, targeted patient experience domains, QI strategies, results of QI, barriers, and promotors for QI. Results: Twenty-one pre–post intervention studies were included for review. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using a Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) Tool. QI strategies used were staff education, patient education, audit and feedback, clinician reminders, organizational change, and policy change. Twenty studies reported improvement in patient experience, 14 studies of the 21 included studies reported statistical significance. Most studies (n=17) reported data-related barriers (eg, questionnaire quality), professional, and/or organizational barriers (eg, skepticism among staff), and 14 studies mentioned specific promoters (eg, engaging staff and patients) for QI. Conclusions: Several patient experience domains are targeted for QI using diverse strategies and methodological approaches. Most studies reported at least one improvement and also barriers and promoters that may influence QI work. Future research should address these barriers and promoters in order to enhance methodological quality and improve patient experiences. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|