Kinesthetic intelligence in welding practice lectures
Autor: | R C Wijaya, Arif Marwanto, Riswan Dwi Djatmiko, Y. E. Wibowo |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1700:012022 |
ISSN: | 1742-6596 1742-6588 |
DOI: | 10.1088/1742-6596/1700/1/012022 |
Popis: | This study aims to determine the student’s kinesthetic intelligence, the level of student’s kinesthetic intelligence and to measure the relationship between kinesthetic intelligence and the learning outcomes of welding practice lectures in the Undergraduate Program of Mechanical Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering, Yogyakarta State University. The method used is a survey. The research was carried out in the Undergraduate Program of Mechanical Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering, Yogyakarta State University. The research was conducted from April to July 2020. The research subjects were students of the 2018 batch of Undergraduate Program of Mechanical Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering, Yogyakarta State University. The research variables are students’ linguistic intelligence (independent) and the learning outcomes of welding practice lectures (dependent). The results showed that the students’ verbal-linguistic intelligence was 72.02%. 6.49% or as many as 5 students make kinesthetic intelligence the highest value compared to other intelligence. The significance value (Sig.) Is 0.416 and greater than 0.05, so it can be concluded that Ha is rejected, and H0 is accepted with kinesthetic intelligence that does not have a significant effect on the learning outcomes of students in the Undergraduate Program of Mechanical Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering, Yogyakarta State University. The value of R Square is 0.011, which means that the influence of kinesthetic intelligence possessed by students (X) on learning outcomes of welding practice students of the Undergraduate Program of Mechanical Engineering Education, Faculty of Engineering, Yogyakarta State University (Y) is only 1.1% while 98.9% is influenced by other variables. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |