P084 MESH USE IN THE UNITED STATES: MESH TYPES AND THEIR INDICATIONS
| Autor: | Robert Tung, Desmond Huynh, Negin Fadaee, Shirin Towfigh, Zayan Khanmohammed |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2021 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | British Journal of Surgery. 108 |
| ISSN: | 1365-2168 0007-1323 |
| DOI: | 10.1093/bjs/znab395.078 |
| Popis: | Aim Synthetic non-absorbable mesh repair is considered standard of care for most hernias in the United States (US). The introduction of biologic absorbable mesh in the 2000’s has changed this practice and now novel synthetic absorbable and hybrid meshes are available. We aim to describe US trends of mesh use. Material and Methods We surveyed the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database for all repairs using mesh from 2012 to 2021. Mesh types and indications were analysed. Results Among 47,555 patients who underwent hernia repair with mesh, the majority were with synthetic non-absorbable meshes (96%). Absorbable mesh was placed in 2,039 (4%) patients and included biologic absorbable (893, 44%), synthetic absorbable (1,070, 52%), and hybrid (76, 4%) meshes. Synthetic non-absorbable mesh use was significantly predominant in all wound classes, including dirty/contaminated wounds (P Conclusions In the United States, synthetic non-absorbable meshes are commonly used during hernia repairs in dirty and contaminated fields. At the same time, there is a significant increase in the use of absorbable and hybrid meshes in the repair of hernias with clean wound classification. The costs and long-term outcomes of such surgeon choices have yet to be validated. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|