What diagnostic strategy performs better for caries lesion detection on proximal surfaces of adolescents?
Autor: | Fernanda Rosche Ferreira, Caroline Moraes Moriyama, Mariana Minatel Braga, Fausto Medeiros Mendes, Michele Baffi Diniz, Bruna Lorena Pereira Moro, José Carlos Pettorossi Imparato, Tatiane Fernandes Novaes |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
Reproducibility
genetic structures business.industry Radiography education Dentistry Laser fluorescence 030206 dentistry Diagnostic strategy humanities Lesion Visual inspection Caries lesion stomatognathic diseases 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Medicine medicine.symptom business General Dentistry Reference standards |
Zdroj: | Clinical Oral Investigations. 25:3977-3986 |
ISSN: | 1436-3771 1432-6981 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00784-020-03728-0 |
Popis: | To evaluate the performance of visual inspection alone and associated to radiographic and laser fluorescence (LF) methods in detecting non-evident caries lesions at adolescents’ proximal surfaces. Adolescents (12 to 17 years old) were assessed for the presence of caries lesions through visual inspection, radiographic examination, and LF method (DIAGNOdent pen), at non-cavitated (NC) and cavitated lesion (CAV) thresholds. Temporary separation with orthodontic rubbers followed by direct visual inspection was the reference standard method. Two examiners conducted the examinations, and the first examiner reassessed around 20% of the sample, to evaluate inter- and intra-examiner reproducibility, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and utility values were calculated for the methods alone and combined with visual inspection using two different strategies: simultaneous and sequential combination. A total of 834 proximal surfaces (51 adolescents) were included. Visual inspection presented higher reproducibility values (higher than 0.98). Moreover, visual inspection presented higher sensitivity (around 0.51) than those obtained with other diagnostic strategies (varying from 0.09 to 0.20) at the NC threshold. For CAV, visual inspection presented higher specificity (0.996) than the sequential association with adjunct methods (around 0.97), but with lower sensitivity. Accuracy and utility values for combined strategies were similar or lower than those achieved with the visual inspection performed alone. Visual inspection alone performs better for detecting caries lesions in premolars and molars of adolescents than other diagnostic strategies. The best diagnostic strategy for caries detection of proximal caries lesions in adolescents is the visual inspection alone. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |