Fractured state of decisions on sustainability: An assessment
Autor: | Subhas K. Sikdar |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
Environmental Engineering
Orthogonality (programming) Renewable Energy Sustainability and the Environment Computer science Process (engineering) 020209 energy media_common.quotation_subject Perspective (graphical) 02 engineering and technology 010501 environmental sciences 01 natural sciences Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering False accusation Extant taxon Risk analysis (engineering) State (polity) Sustainability 0202 electrical engineering electronic engineering information engineering Environmental Chemistry Set (psychology) 0105 earth and related environmental sciences media_common |
Zdroj: | Sustainable Production and Consumption. 19:231-237 |
ISSN: | 2352-5509 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.spc.2019.04.004 |
Popis: | As it is impossible to define or characterize sustainability in the absolute, the pursuit of relative improvement of a properly identified system is the desirable approach for seeking sustainability. One would, however, need a set of proper indicators to measure this relative improvement. Generally, three domains of sustainability, i.e. environmental, economic, and societal are used to identify indicators. The problems of this extant approach are many as there is wide variability of the indicators that can be chosen by investigators for a system under study. Additionally, lack of orthogonality among the indicators can lead to bias, and the indicators frequently show mixed outcomes, some improving but others declining, as a result from some desired process refinement. All these difficulties have created a problem of assessing sustainability improvement and of differentiating logical versus false claims. In this perspective paper, several methods of sustainability assessments are discussed identifying these difficulties. Meanwhile, industry has been using shortcuts to claim sustainability improvements which may or may not be valid. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |