Plurality and crosslinguistic variation: an experimental investigation of the Turkish plural
Autor: | Jacopo Romoli, F. Nihan Ketrez, Hana de Vries, Agata Renans, Raffaella Folli, Yağmur Sağ, Lyn Tieu, George Tsoulas |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
050101 languages & linguistics
Linguistics and Language Turkish media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences 050105 experimental psychology Linguistics Agreement language.human_language Philosophy Denotation English plurals Noun Theoretical linguistics language 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Sociology Sentence media_common Plural |
Zdroj: | Natural Language Semantics. 28:307-342 |
ISSN: | 1572-865X 0925-854X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11050-020-09165-9 |
Popis: | In English and many other languages, the interpretation of the plural is associated with an ‘exclusive’ reading in positive sentences and an ‘inclusive’ reading in negative ones. For example, the plural nountulipsin a sentence such asChicken planted tulipssuggests that Chicken planted more than one tulip (i.e., a reading which ‘excludes’ atomic individual tulips). At the same time, however, the corresponding negative sentenceChicken didn’t plant tulipsdoesn’t merely convey that he didn’t plant more than one tulip, but rather that he didn’t plantanytulip (i.e., ‘including’ atomic individual tulips). Different approaches to the meaning contribution of the English plural vary in how they account for this alternation across the polarities, but converge on assuming that (at least one of) the denotation(s) of the plural should include atomic individuals. Turkish, on the other hand, is cited as one of the few known languages in which the plural only receives an exclusive interpretation (e.g., Bale et al. Cross-linguistic representations of numerals and number marking. in: Li, Lutz (eds) Semantics and linguistic theory (SALT) 20, CLC Publications, Ithaca, pp 582–598, 2010). More recent proposals have, however, argued that the Turkish plural should in fact be analysed more like the English plural (e.g., Sağ, The semantics of number marking: reference to kinds, counting, and optional classifiers, PhD dissertation, Rutgers University, 2019). We report two experiments investigating Turkish-speaking adults’ and preschool-aged children’s interpretation of positive and negative sentences containing plural nouns. The results provide clear evidence forinclusiveinterpretations of the plural in Turkish, supporting accounts that treat the Turkish and English plurals alike. We briefly discuss how an inclusive meaning of the Turkish plural can be integrated within a theory of the Turkish number system which captures some idiosyncratic properties of the singular and the agreement between number and number numerals. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |