Use of the McGRATH™ MAC: To view or not to view?

Autor: Carin A. Hagberg, Sara Guzman-Reyes, Chunyan Cai, Travis H. Markham, Katherine C. Normand, Xu Zhang, Tyrone Burnett, Leslie A. Vargas, Srikanth Sridhar
Rok vydání: 2018
Předmět:
Zdroj: Trends in Anaesthesia and Critical Care. 19:25-33
ISSN: 2210-8440
Popis: Background Due to the life-threatening consequences that a failed tracheal intubation entails, many efforts have been made to identify specific patient features, which may predict difficulty during tracheal intubation. In addition, debate exists as to whether or not video-assisted laryngoscopy (VAL) should replace direct laryngoscopy and if airway practitioners will lose their skills associated with direct laryngoscopy, now that VAL use has increased in clinical practice. Aim This study was designed to determine the first attempt success rate of tracheal intubation with the McGRATH™ MAC laryngoscope using direct visualization in patients with known difficult airways, as well as exploring the possibility of identifying a particular direct Cormack-Lehane (C-L) grade view where indirect (video) visualization can be most beneficial during laryngoscopy and intubation. Methods Following IRB/ethical board approval and written informed consent, 100 adult patients (age > 18 years) with an ASA status I-III and a BMI 2 who met ≥ 2 of the following inclusion criteria: Mallampatti class: III-IV, reduced mouth opening 40 cm for females, > 43 cm for males), thyromental distance Results Out of the 94 patients that were included in the data analysis, 72 (76.6%) were successfully intubated via direct laryngoscopy and 16 (17%) were successfully intubated via indirect (video) laryngoscopy on the first attempt with the McGRATH™ MAC ( P = 0.59). This translates to an overall first-attempt success rate of 96.15% (n = 88). Six patients required a second attempt for tracheal intubation, in which indirect (video) laryngoscopy was then performed, representing an 83% second attempt success rate (n = 5; 5.3%). One patient (1.1%) required a third intubation attempt and an alternative device was used to secure the airway (n = 1; Table 1). The most common initial C-L grade view during the first attempt was a 2b (28.7%), which accounted for 36.1% of the 72 patients that were successfully intubated via direct laryngoscopy (n = 26). A noticeable C-L grade view improvement was observed with the use of the McGRATH™ MAC using the indirect view. Thus, the most common initial indirect C-L grade view during the first attempt was a 1 (54.3%), which accounted for 65.3% of the 72 patients that were successfully intubated via direct laryngoscopy (n = 47). Conclusion The McGRATH™ MAC is a versatile laryngoscope that allows both direct and indirect (video) laryngoscopy to be performed, simultaneously if needed, with a favorable chance of successful intubation during the first attempt. VAL with the McGRATH™ MAC exhibited an enhanced glottic view and served as a successful rescue airway device during inadequate glottic visualization and/or unsuccessful tracheal intubation, after failing with the same device when direct laryngoscopy was performed.
Databáze: OpenAIRE