| Popis: |
both retaliatory and discriminatory; interpreting harassment to be motivated simply by personal animus rather than by a retaliatory or discriminatory purpose; and disaggregating explicitly racialized or sexualized forms of harassment from nonracialized or sexualized forms of conduct. This Note concludes by describing the potential ofjoint harassment/retaliation claims to respond to both status-based and conduct-based discrimination and by offering specific recommendations to courts for reaching an integrated understanding of the two claims. A U T H O R. Yale Law School, J.D. 2007; University of Virginia, B.A. 2003. I am grateful to Vicki Schultz for the teaching that inspired my interest in this topic and for her encouragement and insightful feedback throughout the writing process. Thanks also to Davon Collins for his early comments, to Justin Weinstein-Tull for his careful editing, and to my family for all of their support. |
