| Popis: |
The present study had as a general objective the investigation of the efficacy of two different procedures in order to correct the problems of static vertebral, ciphotic and ciphotic attitude. The two procedures used independently of this study made statistically significant changes in the column angle and the acromion-wall distance, and a hierarchy was established as a result of the results. Thus, for correction of these deficiencies, neuromuscular electrotherapy is the better procedure, and the auditory feedback hammer remains only an alternative with close results in the modification of the dorsal column angle and the scapular-humeral belt deviation, as observed in our research. After an analysis of these results, as a source of documentation for other studies, we have tried to understand why auditory feedback ranks last in terms of efficiency, being a state-of-the-art method that should improve the results. Our conclusion was that monitoring the wearing of the device is difficult, so we asked questions like: what is the percentage of time that was wearing properly? Worthiness of wearing has been improved from one session to another? What is the average recovery time? All of these questions were left unanswered, which is why we thought of expanding the study by using this method - audible feedback. Based on previous data, we want to see if through a software system we can achieve the performance of other recovery methods. The method to be applied for validation will be a comparative method of data. |
