Direct Immersion Single-Drop Microextraction and Continuous-Flow Microextraction for the Determination of Manganese in Tonic Drinks and Seafood Samples
Autor: | Valfredo Azevedo Lemos, Maria das Graças Andrade Korn, Leane Santos Nunes |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Detection limit
Chromatography Materials science 010401 analytical chemistry chemistry.chemical_element 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences Manganese 040401 food science 01 natural sciences Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 0104 chemical sciences Analytical Chemistry Volumetric flow rate Solvent 0404 agricultural biotechnology Certified reference materials chemistry Reagent Safety Risk Reliability and Quality Enrichment factor Graphite furnace atomic absorption Safety Research Food Science |
Zdroj: | Food Analytical Methods. 13:1681-1689 |
ISSN: | 1936-976X 1936-9751 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12161-020-01794-4 |
Popis: | Two methods based on direct immersion single-drop microextraction (DI-SDME) and continuous-flow microextraction (CFME) were developed. Both methods were used for the determination of manganese by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry. The reagent 1-(2-pyridylazo)-2-naphthol (PAN) was used as a complexing agent and 1-butyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluorophosphate [C4MIM][PF6] as an extraction solvent. The extraction efficiencies were compared so that some variables, such as the volume of solvent, time of extraction, stirring speed, and flow rate, were optimized using the univariate method. The limits of detection were 3.9 and 7.9 ng L−1 for DI-SDME and CFME methods, respectively. The enrichment factor for DI-SDME was 18 and for CFME was 15. The accuracy of the method was assessed by analyzing the certified reference material of mussel tissue (SEM 2976), and recovery tests ranged from 92 to 112%. The two categories of LPME are presented as excellent alternatives for the determination of manganese in real samples of tonic drinks and seafood, showing benefits such as low consumption of reagents, ease of operation, and low cost. The DI-SDME-based method is superior to the CFME method if practical aspects are considered, especially for two advantages: less sample volume required and less time to reach equilibrium. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |