Imagination in the Midst of Life: Reconsidering the Relation Between Ideal and Real Possibilities
Autor: | Julia Jansen |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2020 |
Předmět: |
Philosophy
media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences 06 humanities and the arts Modern philosophy 0603 philosophy ethics and religion 050105 experimental psychology Epistemology Phenomenology (philosophy) 060302 philosophy Ontology 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences Consciousness media_common |
Zdroj: | Husserl Studies. 36:287-302 |
ISSN: | 1572-8501 0167-9848 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10743-020-09283-6 |
Popis: | In this article I address the idea that in Husserl’s eidetic ontology all possibilities are fixed ‘in advance’ so that actual objects and events—despite their contingency—can only ever unfold possibilities that are ‘permitted’ to them by their essences. I show how this view distorts Husserl’s ontology and argue that this distortion stems from a misconstrual of the relations between essences and facts, and between ideal and real possibilities. These ‘local’ misconstruals reflect, I contend, a ‘global’ misunderstanding that mistakes descriptive distinctions for ‘real’ separations, and that remains indebted to a non-Husserlian understanding of the a priori–a posteriori-distinction. In support of this argument, I first lay out the relevant objection to Husserl’s eidetics as I understand it. Then, I clarify the relation between ideal and real possibilities in the context of Husserl’s eidetics as I see it. Finally, I make a general point about the status of Husserl’s ontological differentiations ‘in the midst of life,’ namely in how what they differentiate is effective and (tacitly) manifest ever only as one moment (amongst many) of the complex whole that is a concrete life of consciousness. I end with some remarks on what this might mean for future phenomenological research on the imagination. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |