Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair with surgical mesh: how I do it and case series of early experience
Autor: | Mathew A. Kozman, Darren Tonkin, Christopher R. McDonald, Jimmy Eteuati, Alex Karatassas |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2019 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
business.industry Ventral hernia repair Robotic assisted General Medicine medicine.disease Surgery 03 medical and health sciences 0302 clinical medicine Surgical mesh Interquartile range 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis Seroma medicine 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Median body Hernia business Abdominal surgery |
Zdroj: | ANZ Journal of Surgery. 89:248-254 |
ISSN: | 1445-1433 |
DOI: | 10.1111/ans.15071 |
Popis: | Background Laparoscopic ventral hernia repair provides several benefits over the open approach. Intraperitoneal surgical mesh placement without fascial defect closure is associated with increased seroma formation and other adverse hernia-site outcomes. Transfascial sutures and tacs for fascial closure and surgical mesh fixation are associated with greater post-operative pain. Robotic-assisted ventral hernia repair (rVHR) may afford benefits of the laparoscopic approach while facilitating a more robust and less painful repair. Methods Consecutive patients managed by rVHR from May 2015 to August 2018 were identified from a prospectively maintained robotic database. Retrospective review of this data was performed. Results Fifty patients underwent rVHR during the study period. Median body mass index was 31 (interquartile range (IQR) 29-34). Forty-eight had previous abdominal surgery. Forty-seven hernias were midline and three were lateral. Regarding hernia width, 15 were 10 cm. Median total anaesthetic time, docking time and surgical console time were 214 min (IQR 182-252), 5 min (IQR 4-8) and 144 min (IQR 104-174), respectively. No major intra-operative complications occurred. No documented cases of adhesional complications or chronic post-operative pain have occurred. To date, two recurrences have occurred in our series. Median length of hospital stay was 3 days (IQR 2-4). Conclusion We describe our rVHR technique and report on our series and early experience, showing that rVHR can be performed safely with good patient outcomes. We demonstrate a team approach to achieving a safe transition to new technology. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |