Bridging the gulf between biblical scholars and theologians: Can Barth and Wright provide an answer?
| Autor: | Maico Michielin |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2008 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Scottish Journal of Theology. 61:420-434 |
| ISSN: | 1475-3065 0036-9306 |
| Popis: | There was a time when the interpretation of the Bible was a seamless integrated theological activity. Today, the separation of biblical studies from theologically interested exegesis amongst theologians encourages a sceptical arms-length relationship between Old and New Testament scholars and theologians. Theologians criticise biblical studies' so-called objective and disinterested approach to interpreting the Bible for requiring scholars of both testaments to suspend their theological convictions. Biblical scholars condemn theologians for misusing biblical texts in support of their own preconceived theological agendas. The article suggests a way to bring these divergent exegetical approaches into conversation in a charitable, yet critical fashion, by comparing Karl Barth and N. T. Wright's exegesis of Romans 3:21–4:25. It concludes that the biblical scholar's and theologian's respective sensitivity to the historical and theological sense of the biblical text can, when brought together, benefit each other's reading of the Bible. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|