| Autor: |
Jillian Schwedler, Nikhar Gaikwad, Barbara Vis, Samantha Majic, Jonas Tallberg, Lisa Wedeen, Tasha Fairfield, Elisabeth Jean Wood, Mark A. Pollack, Kendra Koivu, Zachary Elkins, Zachariah Cherian Mampilly, Craig Parsons, Antonio Y. Vázquez-Arroyo, Ekrem Karakoç, Yoshiko M. Herrera, Mary Hawkesworth, Sheena Chestnut Greitens, Kimberly J. Morgan, Anastasia Shesterinina, Rachel Beatty Riedl, Tim Büthe, Edward Schatz, Eva Bellin, Leonardo R. Arriola, Lauren M. MacLean, Veronica Herrera, Hillel David Soifer, Wendy Pearlman, Deborah J. Yashar, Timothy W. Luke, Alan M. Jacobs, Marcus Kreuzer, Lisa Björkman, Nicholas Smith, Juliet A. Williams, Sarah E. Parkinson, Diane Singerman, Elliot Posner, Kimberley S. Johnson, Susan Thomson, Robert W. Mickey, Carsten Q. Schneider, Ana Arjona, Scott Spitzer, Andrew Bennett, Rahsaan Maxwell, Erica S. Simmons, Erik Bleich, Milli Lake |
| Rok vydání: |
2019 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
SSRN Electronic Journal. |
| ISSN: |
1556-5068 |
| DOI: |
10.2139/ssrn.3430025 |
| Popis: |
In recent years, a variety of efforts have been made in political science to enable, encourage, or require scholars to be more open and explicit about the bases of their empirical claims and, in turn, make those claims more readily evaluable by others. While qualitative scholars have long taken an interest in making their research open, reflexive, and systematic, the recent push for overarching transparency norms and requirements has provoked serious concern within qualitative research communities and raised fundamental questions about the meaning, value, costs, and intellectual relevance of transparency for qualitative inquiry. This essay is the introduction to a symposium that crystallizes the central findings of a three-year deliberative process – the Qualitative Transparency Deliberations (QTD) – involving hundreds of political scientists in a broad discussion of these issues. The symposium’s centerpiece is a series of summaries of the QTD Working Group’s final reports. Drawing on a series of public, online conversations that unfolded at www.qualtd.net, the reports unpack transparency’s promise, practicalities, risks, and limitations in relation to different qualitative methodologies, forms of evidence, and research contexts. Taken as a whole, these reports offer practical guidance to scholars designing and implementing qualitative research, and to editors, reviewers, and funders seeking to develop criteria of evaluation that are appropriate – as understood by relevant research communities – to the forms of inquiry being assessed. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
