| Autor: |
Jared Gudenkauf, David Hine, Chris Sideroff, Derick Daniel, James S. Masters |
| Rok vydání: |
2016 |
| Předmět: |
|
| Zdroj: |
46th AIAA Fluid Dynamics Conference. |
| DOI: |
10.2514/6.2016-3487 |
| Popis: |
There is a concern in the computational fluid dynamics community that mesh generation is a significant bottleneck in the CFD workflow. This is one of several papers that will help set the stage for a moderated panel discussion addressing this issue. Although certain general "rules of thumb" and a priori mesh metrics can be used to ensure that some base level of mesh quality is achieved, inadequate consideration is often given to the type of solver or particular flow regime on which the mesh will be utilized. This paper explores how an analyst may want to think differently about a mesh based on considerations such as if a flow is compressible vs. incompressible or hypersonic vs. subsonic or if the solver is node-centered vs. cell-centered. This paper is a high-level investigation intended to provide general insight into how considering the nature of the solver or flow when performing mesh generation has the potential to increase the accuracy and/or robustness of the solution and drive the mesh generation process to a state where it is no longer a hindrance to the analysis process. |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
