Well…ah…: Hesitations and Hedges as an Influence on Jurors' Decisions1

Autor: Harmon M. Hosch, Norma A. Mendoza, Bruce Ponder, Victor M. Carrillo
Rok vydání: 2000
Předmět:
Zdroj: Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 30:2610-2621
ISSN: 1559-1816
0021-9029
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02452.x
Popis: Hispanic jurors' verdicts and whether these decisions were related to jurors' judgments of the credibility of the witness were the focus of this experiment. A prosecution witness testified in English or in Spanish with interpretation in English. Witnesses' speaking style systematically included hedges and hesitations or did not. Guilty verdicts were independent of language of testimony. Within Spanish-interpreted conditions, jurors convicted the defendant 47% of the time in the absence of hedges and hesitations. When he hedged and hesitated, they convicted 34% of the time. This effect was complicated by a reliable Witness Hesitation × Juror Language Dominance interaction. These results are interpreted in the context of the courtroom impact of non-English-speaking witnesses and the impact of interpretation.
Databáze: OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz: