Comparative study between herniorrhaphy alone versus hernioplasty in small-sized paraumbilical hernia

Autor:	Abdallah Salah Eldin Abdallah, Ayman A. Albatanoney, Ahmed M. Khattab, Mohammed A. Elbalshy
Rok vydání:	2019
Předmět:	Paraumbilical hernia medicine.medical_specialty business.industry Common disease medicine.disease Wound infection Surgery law.invention Hernia recurrence Randomized controlled trial law Seroma medicine Operation time business Surgical interventions
Zdroj:	International Surgery Journal. 7:31
ISSN:	2349-2902 2349-3305
DOI:	10.18203/2349-2902.isj20195945
Popis:	Background: Paraumbilical hernia is a common disease and its repair is one of the most performed surgical interventions worldwide. The most important techniques in its repair are hernioplasty and herniorrhaphy and both differ significantly.Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial to compare hernioplasty versus herniorrhaphy alone in small-sized paraumbilical hernia as regards local wound complications e.g., seroma and wound infection in addition to recurrence rates, operation time and overall cost, by comparison between two groups each comprising 50 patients.Results: There was no significant difference between both techniques regarding hernia recurrence as well as wound complication. On the other hand, herniorrhaphy reduced significantly incision size, time of operation and overall cost.Conclusions: Our study revealed that herniorrhaphy alone is better in small-sized paraumbilical hernia repair as it showed significant correlation with decrease incision size, time of operation and overall cost.
Databáze:	OpenAIRE
Externí odkaz:	https://explore.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=doi_________::bc3b3e2aba51f5b9b42262550638d769 https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20195945 Zobrazit plný text záznamu