Abstract 11: Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Oral Anticoagulants across Baseline Kidney Function

Autor: Brahmajee K. Nallamothu, Aliza Thompson, Mary Ross Southworth, David Martin, David J. Graham, Karl A. Nath, Nilay Shah, Jonathan Inselman, Nihar R. Desai, Joseph S. Ross, Che Ngufor, Xiaoxi Yao, Peter A. Noseworthy, Rima Izem, Rajiv Saran, Konstantinos C. Siontis
Rok vydání: 2019
Předmět:
Zdroj: Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes. 12
ISSN: 1941-7705
1941-7713
Popis: Background: Stroke prevention using warfarin is challenging in AF patients with CKD, due to high bleeding risk and difficulties in the INR control. NOACs provide alternative options, but all have greater degrees of renal clearance. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of apixaban, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin across the range of kidney function in patients with AF. Methods: Using a US administrative database including private insurance or Medicare Advantage patients with linked claims and laboratory data, we identified 34,569 new users of oral anticoagulants with AF and eGFR ≥15 between 10/1/2010-11/29/2017. Stabilized IPTW balanced four treatment groups on 66 baseline characteristics. The primary outcomes included stroke, major bleeding, and mortality. Weighted Cox proportional hazards models compared treatments in the overall population and in each eGFR subgroup, with mortality as a competing risk for stroke and major bleeding. Results: The proportion of patients using warfarin increased as the kidney function declined - 26.5%, 30.4%, 34.6%, 40.5%, and 55.0% of patients were prescribed warfarin in eGFR ≥90, 60-90, 45-60, 30-45, 15-30 groups, respectively. In comparison to warfarin, apixaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke, major bleeding, and mortality; dabigatran was associated with a similar risk of stroke, and a lower risk of major bleeding and mortality; rivaroxaban was associated with a lower risk of stroke, major bleeding, and mortality (Figure). When comparing one NOAC to another NOAC, apixaban and dabigatran were associated with a lower risk of major bleeding than rivaroxaban (HR 0.61 [0.51-0.73], p Conclusions: In practice, relative to warfarin, NOACs are progressively less commonly used with increasing degree of renal dysfunction. However, each NOAC was consistently associated with at least equivalent effectiveness and safety compared with warfarin across the range of kidney function.
Databáze: OpenAIRE