Forecasting Solar Cycle 25 with Physical Model-Validated Recurrent Neural Networks
Autor: | Aleix Espuña Fontcuberta, Anubhab Ghosh, Saikat Chatterjee, Dhrubaditya Mitra, Dibyendu Nandy |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2023 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Solar Physics. 298 |
ISSN: | 1573-093X 0038-0938 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11207-022-02104-3 |
Popis: | The Sun’s activity, which is associated with the solar magnetic cycle, creates a dynamic environment in space known as space weather. Severe space weather can disrupt space-based and Earth-based technologies. Slow decadal-scale variations on solar-cycle timescales are important for radiative forcing of the Earth’s atmosphere and impact satellite lifetimes and atmospheric dynamics. Predicting the solar magnetic cycle is therefore of critical importance for humanity. In this context, a novel development is the application of machine-learning algorithms for solar-cycle forecasting. Diverse approaches have been developed for this purpose; however, with no consensus across different techniques and physics-based approaches. Here, we first explore the performance of four different machine-learning algorithms – all of them belonging to a class called Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) – in predicting simulated sunspot cycles based on a widely studied, stochastically forced, nonlinear time-delay solar dynamo model. We conclude that the algorithm Echo State Network (ESN) performs the best, but predictability is limited to only one future sunspot cycle, in agreement with recent physical insights. Subsequently, we train the ESN algorithm and a modified version of it (MESN) with solar-cycle observations to forecast Cycles 22 – 25. We obtain accurate hindcasts for Solar Cycles 22 – 24. For Solar Cycle 25 the ESN algorithm forecasts a peak amplitude of 131 ± 14 sunspots around July 2024 and indicates a cycle length of approximately 10 years. The MESN forecasts a peak of 137 ± 2 sunspots around April 2024, with the same cycle length. Qualitatively, both forecasts indicate that Cycle 25 will be slightly stronger than Cycle 24 but weaker than Cycle 23. Our novel approach bridges physical model-based forecasts with machine-learning-based approaches, achieving consistency across these diverse techniques. |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |