| Popis: |
This article argues for an update of the Unfair Contract Terms Directive of 1993 in light of the Commission’s Digital Single Market Strategy of 2015. The Directive in its current setup tolerates a certain amount of differences in the unfairness assessment based on national law due to its minimum harmonization approach and the mechanism of decentralized enforcement by national courts according to national law, designed by the CJEU. A comparative unfairness assessment of contract terms of five popular online platform service providers according to the national laws of Germany, the UK and France reveals just how different the result really is. The differences in national unfairness assessment according to the laws of the Member States go beyond the amount of differences justified by the Directive viewed from the perspective of the Commission’s legislative strategy. This inconsistency can be resolved by an update of the Unfair Contract Terms Directive. A modernization and the adoption of a maximum harmonization approach seem the most adequate considering the Digital Single Market Strategy. Right now, the Directive is stuck on the symbolic platform 9¾ – in between platform 9, the offline world for which it was created, and platform 10, the digital market. Online Platform Service Providers, Unfair Contract Terms, Digital SingleOnline Platform Service Providers, Unfair Contract Terms, Digital Single Market, Liability Clauses |
