| Popis: |
Study Objective To compare the efficacy and safety between two methods such as conventional intracorporeal Barbed suture and vaginal approached Barbed suture in single port TLH. Design Retrospective analysis of 194 consecutive cases of single port TLH. Setting Single surgeon in University Hospital. Patients or Participants 194 women (ages 33-53 yrs) undergoing single port Total Laparoscopic hysterectomy. 99 women were conventional intracorporeal Barbed suture group, 96 women were vaginal approached Barbed suture group. Interventions Charts were reviewed to determine post-operative complications and surgical values. A comparison was made between two groups in post-operative hemoglobin, and hematocrits changes, operation time, blood loss during operation, post-operative drainage volume.(n=194) Measurements and Main Results There were no statistically significant difference between two groups in terms of age, indication for surgery, uterine size, body mass index, parity. There were no significant difference in the average time of the procedure between two groups(conventional intracorporeal Barbed suture vs vaginal approached Barbed suture), 45.0 min vs 44.1 min(p Conclusion Two methods of conventional intracorporeal Barbed suture and vaginal approached Barbed suture in single port TLH were feasible and safe. |
