| Autor: |
Moghissi, A. Alan, Calderone, Richard, Jaeger, Lisa, Real, Lismary, Alessa, Yousef, Alsharif, Mansour, Debrah, Henry, Garrison, Destini, Ginigeme, Anita, Lamoureux, Bralen, Li, Yanzhuo, Lin, Yuhan, Ogletree, Camden, Shadid, Hadeel, Sohail, Saher, Sohail, Soha, Persaud, Misti, Ephraim, Natalie, Oh, Joohye, Pan, Tianze, Trippe, Lauren |
| Rok vydání: |
2019 |
| DOI: |
10.21423/jrs-v07moghissi |
| Popis: |
In its proposed rule, Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) requires transparency in certain areas of regulatory science. The proposed rule mandates public access to the details of studies that address dose response and models. This paper is the result of a study conducted by graduate students at Georgetown University. The study relied upon a specific process for selecting a small number from an exceptionally large number of responses to study the subject. The evaluation of the responses was largely based on Best Available Regulatory Science (BARS) and Metrics for Evaluation of Regulatory Science Claims derived from BARS. The results of the study indicate that opposition to the EPA's proposed rule is largely based on the claim that its implementation would eliminate key studies that contain confidential data from consideration during the regulatory process. Although the proposed rule would allow exemptions from the public access requirements, there is opposition to making exemptions available at the discretion of the EPA Administrator. The study concluded that a regulatory science process called "controlled transparency" would be a reasonable solution to compliance with transparency requirements while protecting confidential information.https://doi.org/10.21423/jrs-v07moghissi |
| Databáze: |
OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
