| Popis: |
In October 2007, the Nobel Committee awarded its Peace Prize jointly to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and the American politician Al Gore “for their eff orts to build up and disseminate greater knowledge about man-made climate change, and to lay the foundations for the measures that are needed to counteract such change” (Nobel Foundation, 2008 ). Th is award represented the fi rst unambiguous statement by the Committee of the importance of defending the environment. True, the 2004 Peace Prize given to Wangari Maathai mentioned her contributions to sustainable development, but the primary criterion for the award was her work on behalf of “democracy, human rights and women’s rights in particular” (Nobel Foundation, 2008 ). Th us, the 2007 award can be considered a milestone in the decades-old struggle to bring attention to the harmful eff ects of human activities on the environment, a recognition that environmentalists have been waiting for a long time. Or can it? Are the ecology activists who have fought for the preservation of the environment for decades – by joining the words “green” and “peace”, by demonstrating in the streets, by chaining themselves to gates, by spending time in jail – pleased with the 2007 award? Do they feel happy with this highly visible recognition of the cause for which they have so long fought? Or do they feel bitter disappointment that the prize was awarded, not to one or more of their organizations, but instead to two relative newcomers to the cause – an intergovernmental panel and a professional politician? More generally, what are the reactions of minority groups that have succeeded in inducing social infl uence and have not received credit for it? Th is question is at the heart of the issues we address in this chapter. 1 4 |
