On the relative effectiveness of affect regulation strategies: A meta-analysis
Autor: | Scott H. Hemenover, Adam A. Augustine |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2009 |
Předmět: | |
Zdroj: | Cognition and Emotion. 23:1181-1220 |
ISSN: | 1464-0600 0269-9931 |
DOI: | 10.1080/02699930802396556 |
Popis: | To examine the effectiveness of various affect regulation strategies and categories of affect regulation strategies, a meta-analysis was conducted. Results generally indicate that reappraisal (d=0.65) and distraction (d=0.46 for all studies; d=0.95 for studies with a negative or no affect induction) are the most effective regulation/repair strategies, producing the largest hedonic shift in affect. The effectiveness of different categories of regulation/repair strategies depended on the valence of the preceding affect induction. Results also indicate that stronger affect inductions and the use of bivariate affect measures will provide a richer understanding of affect regulation. Additionally, not all specific strategies or categories of strategies have been researched and the impact of individual differences on affect regulation has received relatively little attention. Finally, results indicate that control conditions in affect regulation research may not provide a valid point for comparison, as they faci... |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: | |
Nepřihlášeným uživatelům se plný text nezobrazuje | K zobrazení výsledku je třeba se přihlásit. |