Disciplinary, national, and departmental contributions to the literature of library and information science, 2007-2012
| Autor: | Esther Isabelle Wilder, William H. Walters |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
Information Systems and Management
Computer Networks and Communications business.industry media_common.quotation_subject 05 social sciences Library science Distribution (economics) Library and Information Sciences 050905 science studies Information science Competition (economics) 0509 other social sciences 050904 information & library sciences business China Productivity Discipline Information Systems Reputation media_common |
| Zdroj: | Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67:1487-1506 |
| ISSN: | 2330-1635 |
| DOI: | 10.1002/asi.23448 |
| Popis: | We investigate the contributions of particular disciplines, countries, and academic departments to the literature of library and information science LIS using data for the articles published in 31 journals from 2007 to 2012. In particular, we examine the contributions of authors outside the United States, the United Kingdom, and Canada; faculty in departments other than LIS; and practicing librarians. Worldwide, faculty in LIS departments account for 31% of the journal literature; librarians, 23%; computer science faculty, 10%; and management faculty, 10%. The top contributing nations are the United States, the United Kingdom, Spain, China, Canada, and Taiwan. Within the United States and the United Kingdom, the current productivity of LIS departments is correlated with past productivity and with other measures of reputation and performance. More generally, the distribution of contributions is highly skewed. In the United States, five departments account for 27% of the articles contributed by LIS faculty; in the United Kingdom, four departments account for nearly two-thirds of the articles. This skewed distribution reinforces the possibility that high-status departments may gain a permanent advantage in the competition for students, faculty, journal space, and research funding. At the same time, concentrations of research-active faculty in particular departments may generate beneficial spillover effects. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text