The coupling-constitution fallacy

Autor: Charles Lassiter, Aaron Kagan
Rok vydání: 2013
Předmět:
Zdroj: Pragmatics and Cognition. 21:178-192
ISSN: 1569-9943
0929-0907
DOI: 10.1075/pc.21.1.08kag
Popis: The coupling-constitution fallacy claims that arguments for extended cognition involve the inference of “x and y constitute z” from “x is coupled to y” and that such inferences are fallacious. We argue that the coupling-constitution fallacy fails in its goal to undermine the hypothesis of extended cognition: appeal to the coupling-constitution fallacy to rule out possible empirical counterexamples to intracranialism is fallacious. We demonstrate that appeals to coupling-constitution worries are problematic by constructing the fallacious argument against the hypothesis of extended cognition. We consider several objections to our argument and find them insufficient to rebut our conclusion.
Databáze: OpenAIRE