Real farm management depending on the available volume of irrigation water (part I): Financial analysis
| Autor: | José Maria Tarjuelo, A. Domínguez, A. Martínez-Romero, A. Martínez-Navarro, E. López-Mata |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
Irrigation
geography geography.geographical_feature_category business.industry 0208 environmental biotechnology Deficit irrigation Soil Science Distribution (economics) Aquifer 04 agricultural and veterinary sciences 02 engineering and technology Gross margin 020801 environmental engineering Agricultural science Agronomy 040103 agronomy & agriculture Financial analysis 0401 agriculture forestry and fisheries Environmental science Profitability index Stage (hydrology) business Agronomy and Crop Science Earth-Surface Processes Water Science and Technology |
| Zdroj: | Agricultural Water Management. 192:71-84 |
| ISSN: | 0378-3774 |
| DOI: | 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.06.022 |
| Popis: | The MOPECO model tries to maximize the gross margin of farms through a more efficient use of both the irrigable land and the irrigation water. The objective of this work was to compare the profitability of a real irrigation farm managed following two different strategies. The Traditional strategy (T) consisted in applying full irrigation (F treatments) to a distribution of three crops (barley, maize, and onion) considering several volumes of irrigation water (from 1000 up to 8000 m3 ha−1) and four scenarios of harvest sale price. Depending on the availability of irrigation water, the MOPECO strategy (M) consisted in applying to the same crops full irrigation or the combinations of water deficit per growing stage determined by the optimized regulated deficit irrigation (ORDI) methodology developed for this model (O treatments). The optimal global deficits calculated by MOPECO for these crops were: 70% ETm for barley, 90% ETm for maize, and 90% ETm for onion. The experiment was conducted during years 2014 and 2015 in the semiarid province of Albacete (Spain). For low availabilities of irrigation water (between 2000 and 5000 m3 ha−1) the M strategy reached a profitability up to 8.2% higher than T in the most favorable scenario. This value is similar to the predicted by MOPECO for the average conditions of the area. In the rest of scenarios, the profitability was lower than expected due to the drought conditions of the two experimental years, the unfavorable climatic conditions during 2015 for onion and maize, and the prices progression during both seasons. MOPECO may also be used for decreasing the amount of pumped water from the aquifer (around 43.9 hm3 year−1 for average conditions), achieving the same profitability than the T strategies. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full Text from ScienceDirect