| Popis: |
Accurate annotation of putative loss-of-function (pLoF) variants is an important problem in human genomics and disease, which recently drew substantial attention. Since such variants in disease-related genes are under strong negative selection, their frequency across major ancestral groups is expected to be highly similar. In this study, we tested this assumption by systematically assessing the presence of highly population-specific protein-truncating variants (PTVs) in human genes using latest population-scale data. We discovered an unexpectedly high incidence of population-specific PTVs in all major ancestral groups. This does not conform to a recently proposed model, indicating either systemic differences in disease penetrance in different human populations, or a failure of current annotation criteria to accurately predict the loss-of-function potential of PTVs. We show that low-confidence pLoF variants are enriched in genes with non-uniform PTV count distribution, and developed a computational tool called LoFfeR that can efficiently predict tolerated pLoF variants. To evaluate the performance of LoFfeR, we use a set of known pathogenic and benign PTVs from the ClinVar database, and show that LoFfeR allows for a more accurate annotation of low-confidence pLoF variants compared to existing methods. Notably, only 4.4% of protein-truncating gnomAD SNPs in canonical transcripts can be filtered out using a recommended threshold value of the recently proposed pext score, while up to 10.9% of such variants are filtered using LoFfeR with the same false positive rate. Hence, we believe that LoFfeR can be used for additional filtering of low-confidence pLoF variants in population genomics and medical genetics studies. |
