A preliminary evaluation of two different meshes in minimally invasive inguinal hernia surgery
| Autor: | William F. Powers, William W. Hope, Robert G. Johnson, Paul L Tenzel, Jordan A Bilezikian |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2020 |
| Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
business.industry medicine.medical_treatment Inguinal hernia surgery Hernia repair medicine.disease Surgery Clinical trial 03 medical and health sciences Inguinal hernia 0302 clinical medicine Insertion time 030220 oncology & carcinogenesis medicine 030211 gastroenterology & hepatology Polygon mesh Hernia business Abdominal surgery |
| Zdroj: | Surgical Endoscopy. 35:1342-1347 |
| ISSN: | 1432-2218 0930-2794 |
| DOI: | 10.1007/s00464-020-07512-9 |
| Popis: | Many meshes are available for use in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. The surgeon must consider several factors when choosing a mesh for hernia repair including clinical outcomes, cost, and ease of use. The purpose of this study was to compare two different lightweight polypropylene meshes for laparoscopic and robotic inguinal hernia repairs. Subjects were randomized immediately before surgery. Data were reported in N (%) and median [Q1–Q3], comparisons of mesh insertion time were tested using a 2 × 2 ANOVA on the ranked times, comparisons between categorical variables were tested with Fisher’s Exact, and all data were analyzed using SAS® 9.4 (SAS Institute, Inc.). Between January 2015 and June 2016, 50 subjects were enrolled; two were excluded. Of 48 eligible subjects, most were Caucasian (N = 42, 88%), male (N = 37, 77%), with a median age of 63, and were randomized evenly between 3DMax™ mesh and Ultrapro® mesh. Robotic mesh placement significantly increased insertion time regardless of mesh type (p |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Full text from SpringerLink