Additional file 2: of Enhancing the uptake of systematic reviews of effects: what is the best format for health care managers and policy-makers? A mixed-methods study

Autor: Marquez, Christine, Alekhya Johnson, Jassemi, Sabrina, Park, Jamie, Moore, Julia, Blaine, Caroline, Bourdon, Gertrude, Chignell, Mark, Ellen, Moriah, Fortin, Jacques, Graham, Ian, Hayes, Anne, Jemila Hamid, Hemmelgarn, Brenda, Hillmer, Michael, Holmes, Bev, Jayna Holroyd-Leduc, Hubert, Linda, Hutton, Brian, Kastner, Monika, Lavis, John, Michell, Karen, Moher, David, Ouimet, Mathieu, Perrier, Laure, Proctor, Andrea, Noseworthy, Thomas, Schuckel, Victoria, Stayberg, Sharlene, Tonelli, Marcello, Tricco, Andrea, Straus, Sharon
Předmět:
Popis: Figure SA1: Phase 1. Content components that were considered of interest; Figure SA2: Phase 1. Content component modifications that were considered important; Figure SA3: Phase 1. Format features that were considered satisfactory; Figure SA4: Phase 1. Format feature modifications that were considered important; Table SA1: Phase 1. Preference towards font and color; Table SA2: Phase 2. Preference towards color, content, and layout; and Table SA3: Phase 2. Voting results towards color, content, and layout. (DOCX 81 kb)
Databáze: OpenAIRE