To Intervene in Darfur, or Not: Re-examining the R2P Debate and Its Impact
| Autor: | Madhan Mohan Jaganathan, Ricardo Soares de Oliveira, Harry Verhoeven |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2015 |
| Předmět: |
Global and Planetary Change
05 social sciences Geography Planning and Development 050801 communication & media studies Humanitarian intervention 0506 political science Formative assessment Politics 0508 media and communications Regime change Law Political economy 050602 political science & public administration Sociology Norm (social) Outrage Responsibility to protect Communism |
| Zdroj: | Global Society. 30:21-37 |
| ISSN: | 1469-798X 1360-0826 |
| DOI: | 10.1080/13600826.2015.1093464 |
| Popis: | The outrage over genocidal violence in Sudan provided impetus to “legalise” the concept of humanitarian intervention into a “responsibility to protect” (R2P). However, a decade on, the literature treats Darfur and R2P as coterminous with failure: continued inaction underscored its limitations in delivering protection to civilians. This article argues that this is an impoverished reading, which leaves out important dynamics. The legacy of Darfur is more usefully understood as a formative experience for further intervention, rather than as a benchmark of (non-)compliance with the specificities of an evolving R2P norm. We analyse an intensifying functional convergence between Western actors, the Chinese Communist Party and the African Union around the practice of intervention, with a view to creating political order and not to foster regime change, on the continent. Darfur, in this reading, was an indicator of the increasing tendency towards approaching Africa through an interventionist lens of stabilisation... |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|