Clinical and patient-reported outcomes of reverse shoulder arthroplasty in patients receiving Social Security Disability Insurance or workers’ compensation
Autor: | Matthew Binkley, Jacob Joseph, Gary W. Pushkin, Edward G. McFarland, Uma Srikumaran, Prashant Meshram |
---|---|
Rok vydání: | 2021 |
Předmět: |
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.diagnostic_test business.industry Visual analogue scale medicine.medical_treatment Minimal clinically important difference Workers' compensation Retrospective cohort study Physical examination Arthroplasty Physical therapy Medicine Orthopedics and Sports Medicine Surgery business Range of motion Disability insurance |
Zdroj: | Seminars in Arthroplasty: JSES. 31:737-743 |
ISSN: | 1045-4527 |
Popis: | Background Evidence suggests that reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) patients receiving workers’ compensation (WC) have worse patient-reported outcomes (PROs) than those not receiving WC. It is unknown whether Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) recipients also have worse outcomes of RSA. Our goals were to (1) compare PROs and range of motion (ROM) after RSA according to whether patients were receiving SSDI, WC, or neither form of assistance, and (2) identify factors associated with poor PROs. Methods From a US institutional database of 454 patients who underwent RSA from January 2009 through December 2016, we identified 19 SSDI recipients and 25 WC recipients. From the same database, we created a control group of 81 patients not receiving SSDI or WC, matched by demographic variables. Between groups, we compared age, sex, operative arm dominance, preoperative diagnosis, number of previous shoulder surgeries, primary or revision arthroplasty, and Charlson Comorbidity Index value. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and at a minimum of 2 years postoperatively by physical examination, including range of motion, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score, L'Insalata score, Simple Shoulder Test (SST), and Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder (WOOS) score. Significance was set at P Results Both the SSDI and WC groups experienced statistically significant improvements from preoperatively to postoperatively; these improvements exceeded MCID thresholds for forward flexion and abduction, VAS for pain, ASES (except in WC group), and SST score (all, P Conclusion Among RSA patients, SSDI recipients did not have worse clinical outcomes than WC recipients. Having undergone ≥2 previous procedures on the same shoulder was associated with poor outcomes in both groups. These findings should be considered when determining the appropriateness of RSA for SSDI and WC recipients. Level of evidence Level III; Retrospective Cohort Comparison; Treatment Study |
Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
Externí odkaz: |