Effectiveness of seed sowing techniques for sloped restoration sites
| Autor: | Paige Austin, Nicole Tamura, Kathleen R. Balazs, Travis E. Huxman, Sarah Kimball, Christopher A. Halsch, Megan E. Lulow, Matthew R. Major |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2017 |
| Předmět: |
0106 biological sciences
010504 meteorology & atmospheric sciences Ecology ved/biology Cost effectiveness ved/biology.organism_classification_rank.species food and beverages Sowing Growing season Native plant 010603 evolutionary biology 01 natural sciences Shrub Hydroseeding Agronomy Environmental science Seeding Restoration ecology Ecology Evolution Behavior and Systematics 0105 earth and related environmental sciences Nature and Landscape Conservation |
| Zdroj: | Restoration Ecology. 25:942-952 |
| ISSN: | 1526-100X 1061-2971 |
| DOI: | 10.1111/rec.12515 |
| Popis: | Practitioners are challenged with choosing among many potentially effective methods for sowing seed in ecological restoration projects to achieve sufficient native plant establishment. We tested the effectiveness of seed sowing techniques on moderate and steep slopes in a Mediterranean climate by measuring native seedling density immediately following germination, as well as plant density, recruitment success, and soil movement through the second growing season. We calculated cost effectiveness of different methods as the native plant density per dollar spent sowing seed. While all sowing techniques resulted in significant native establishment compared with unseeded controls, hydro seeding on moderate slopes was the most cost effective (native seedlings established per dollar spent). Although all steep-sloped seeding techniques resulted in high densities of native species, all methods also resulted in significant soil loss. Shrubs preferred hand seeding followed by jute netting on steep slopes, while forbs reached greatest densities with hydro seeding on moderate slopes. Seedlings of species with heavy seeds were present in greater densities than species with lighter seeds in imprint sowing treatments. The “best” seed sowing technique varied depending on slope and metric of success (native density, species richness, shrub density, or forb density). Different combinations of slope, technique, and success metric resulted in significantly different project costs, which implies opportunities for savings given careful decision-making relative to mitigation needs on heterogeneous landscapes. Evaluations of techniques for restoring slopes are limited, yet critical for expanding the area capable of being restored and the application of limited conservation funding. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|
Plný text