Brandom on Hegel and the Retrospective Determination of Intention
| Autor: | Steven Levine |
|---|---|
| Rok vydání: | 2022 |
| Předmět: | |
| Zdroj: | Hegel Bulletin. :1-26 |
| ISSN: | 2051-5375 2051-5367 |
| Popis: | In this paper I examine Brandom's account of Hegel's claim that the content of an intention can only be determined retrospectively. While Brandom's account, given in Chapter 11 of A Spirit of Trust, sets a new standard for thinking about this topic, I argue that it is flawed in three important respects. First, Brandom is not able to make sense of a distinction that is central for Hegel, namely, between the consequences of an action that ought to have been foreseen by an acting agent, given the right of objectivity of the action, and unforeseeable consequences that are completely contingent. Second, Brandom incorrectly conceptualizes the disparity and unity that all actions display as temporally successive features of an action, rather than as speculatively identical features. Third, Brandom's account cannot make sense of cases of retrospective determination that involve self-deception, and this demonstrates that he misses something critical about Hegel's account of action, namely, that action is expressive of the logic of essence. |
| Databáze: | OpenAIRE |
| Externí odkaz: |
|